03-21-2016, 07:39 PM
(03-21-2016, 05:28 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: The Bengals never once said Dalton would be back, they only hoped he'd be back in time for the divisional game. How is that jacking around with the injury report? Dude got injured, they listed the injury and said they didn't have an exact timeline for his return. That's the exact opposite of jacking around with the injury report.
"playoff return possible"
http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/cincinnati-begals-no-surgery-for-andy-dalton-playoff-return-possible-121415
"return for playoffs hopeful"
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000601513/article/dalton-wont-have-surgery-return-for-playoffs-hopeful
Never got to learn if he could play in the Divisional round because they didn't make it so he didn't get the chance to cut off the cast early and try.
Now compare that to your theory that Hill was hurt for 12 months and not once had it listed on the injury report. The simple fact that we all know that Dalton had a broken thumb and many articles were written about it makes it completely different than a theoretical secret phantom year-long injury conspiracy.
Because it was announced after the season that they knew all along that he would not be back at any point in the playoffs...Man can you not understand anything or are you just stubborn.... They released the above reports you posted and then announced AFTER THE PLAYOFF LOSS that they knew all along that he would not be back...Is that or is that not jacking with the injury report?
