Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Touch backs to the 25 and Tate
#13
(03-23-2016, 11:55 AM)Stormborn Wrote: This rule smells like counter-productivity.

(03-23-2016, 12:26 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: I'm not a fan of this change. Absolutely no need for it IMO.

(03-23-2016, 12:44 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Pretty much. We'll never see another Devin Hester or Josh Cribbs.

It's just extending one of the most boring parts of any football game. TD, commercial, PAT, commercial, Touchback, commercial... three commercial breaks split up by like 30 seconds of game. While taking away one of the most exciting parts of any football game, which is a great return for a TD.

Yeah, absolutely hate the move. Was bad enough the last couple years, this is even worse. Whatever

To the OP, i doubt Tate makes the team if we bring in Lafell and a Draft pick. This takes lots of Tate's importance away
which was he was sure handed and an ok returner. He was not near as bad as some say but we could definately improve
the position. Adam, Alford, Lafell and hopefully a speedy Draft pick make Tate extremely expendable.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Touch backs to the 25 and Tate - Crowe - 03-23-2016, 01:00 PM
RE: Touch backs to the 25 and Tate - Nate (formerly eliminate08) - 03-23-2016, 01:52 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)