04-06-2016, 01:44 AM
(04-05-2016, 09:29 PM)bfine32 Wrote: He has complied in the past. Now you are just making assumptions to support your feeble strawman. Anything else you want to try?
So you would not grant him the exemption, but you would not discipline him if he did not comply?
Sorry I assumed someone like you would believe there should be "consequences for actions". Don't know where I would have gotten that idea.
