04-12-2016, 04:05 PM
(04-12-2016, 03:29 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: What's more likely?
A: Rudi was a talented RB who didn't get much PT because he was stuck behind Curtis Keaton, Brandon Bennett, Nick Luchey, and a workhorse who happened to be the best RB in team history.
B: Rudi was a mediocre back who only looked good cuz Marvin.
FIFY
And how silly of me to give coaches any credit when players blossom under them. But the good news is that if coaches have nothing to do with how well players perform then Marvin deserves no blame at all for any losses by the Bengals. No need to ever change coaches if they have nothing to do with how well players perform, right?