04-12-2016, 04:24 PM
(04-12-2016, 03:52 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: When did I say that 29 other coaches should be fired? Seriously, show me where I said that.
Those other coaches/teams have situations that are varied in terms of what they're doing, what their expectations are and where they're at as an organization. The Bengals situation is completely unique to the Bengals. No other team has 5 straight playoff appearances without a single win. Whether or not any coach should be fired is determined by the specifics of that particular situation.
You want to fire Marvin because he has not been successful in your eyes. And apparently the only teams that have been succesful over the last few years in your eyes are the Pats, Broncos, and Seahawks. So it is only logical that you think all the other coaches should be fired.
Surely you are not trying to say that a guy who has not been as succesfuls as Marvin should be retained while Marvin gets fired. that doesn't make any sense.
(04-12-2016, 03:52 PM)Bengalholic Wrote: You seem to be more than willing to compare the Bengals to every team except those that have been more successful during the same time period.
Why can't you just admit that those three teams have actually did what you're supposed to do...which is translate multiple playoff opportunities into postseason victories.
I freely admit that. Only I am not the one saying that every coach other than the ones for these three teams should be fired.
Why do you refuse to compare Marvin to ALL the coaches instead of just the top three?
