Open carry in Support of Trump in Pittsburgh

[Vas Deferens]

(04-13-2016, 08:52 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I thought referencing the Oregon situation might dispel the notion that just because someone carries a open weapon they condone (or to use my word advocate) killing citizens; and therefore. the assertion need not be "denied".  Apparently, I was mistaken.

So to clear the gray area: If they advocate killing innocent citizens I will condemn their actions.   

So who do they need to kill in this situation?   Why the need for the deadly firearms?