04-14-2016, 12:39 PM
(04-13-2016, 08:52 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I thought referencing the Oregon situation might dispel the notion that just because someone carries a open weapon they condone (or to use my word advocate) killing citizens; and therefore. the assertion need not be "denied". Apparently, I was mistaken.You mean the Oregon situation where an armed citizen was killed for trying to pull his gun on police officers?
Gee, I wonder why that did not "dispel the notion" that a person carrying a gun is not willing to commit unjustified murder?
