Open carry in Support of Trump in Pittsburgh

[*bfine32*]

(04-14-2016, 12:36 PM)fredtoast Wrote: There is no need to carry a weapon except in self defense.

So when you carry a weapon to keep people from establishing roadblocks that is threatening use of deadly force when NOT in a position of self defense.

Everyone gets this except Bfine. That is why the post was taken down. It was wrong to suggest that citizens would be justified in shooting other citizens just for setting up roadblocks.

What is the need to establish a roadblock?

When you establish a roadblock your intent is to impede traffic; that may include emergency vehicles and others with medical emergencies.

Everyone understands this but liberals that think putting up illegal roadblocks is a good idea. That's why these "patrols" were planning to respond to roadbloacks. I don't believe any threats of violence were extended and most likely only percieved by those willing to break the law; which those carrying weapons did not.