04-20-2016, 04:55 PM
(04-19-2016, 11:43 AM)Crazyjdawg Wrote: I agree about both QBs. But Coleman actually shows up on PFF's Most underrated prospects list:
https://www.profootballfocus.com/blog/2016/03/14/draft-10-most-underrated-nfl-draft-prospects-for-2016/
(04-19-2016, 04:15 PM)Stormborn Wrote: Drops are a fair flag, as for the lack of routes and taking plays off, justifiable.
Baylor scheme has QBs only throw to first read, he wasn't the primary option, he was never apart of the play. Opposing teams even knew that. He'll be fine out of the scheme.
I want him accustomed to more routes, but he's fine at the basic vertical group along with slants and screens. He's got the foot work to adjust to more complex branches.
(04-20-2016, 10:17 AM)fredtoast Wrote: This. It is like a college DE that gets by on raw physical ability and doesn't have a lot of pass rush moves. I'd rather take a guy like that and teach him moves than a guy who has already maxed out his ability. And I'd take a WR who can get deep and teach him routes than a WR who had to depend on route running to get open against college DBs.
(04-20-2016, 04:37 PM)Okeana Wrote: This is kinda off topic, but if we got coleman in round one and shepard in round 2 I may just shoot a load in my pants. I think its almost two much talent to invest into a WR position.
(04-20-2016, 04:44 PM)WrongVerb Wrote: A few AFC North defenses might have the same reaction.
Happy quite a few see the same things i see with Coleman.
The Steve Smith comparison seems very valid to me, he might be even more explosive than SS was in his prime.
Go ahead and doubt him cause of his size, go ahead. Dude will give secondarys fits.
