Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
WR's in Rd's 3 and 5...again?
#8
(04-26-2016, 08:48 PM)J24 Wrote: Disagree Lafell will be a nice WR for us this season.plus we have Eifert and Benard who are good receiving threats even though their not Wrs.

(04-26-2016, 08:51 PM)milksheikh Wrote: You're telling me that LaFell will get all the 160 targets that was divided among Jones and Sanu...?

I highly doubt that happens and pretty sure we draft a WR if not in 1st than in 2nd or 3rd.

It's all about expectations with these guys. Lafell should be a great pickup, but he is a Sanu replacement/slight upgrade imo. He will not be enough to replace the production lost, but with another solid rookie and increased roles from some of our other players the offense should be in good shape. 

That makes the question: Can we get a WR that can come in this season and produce 75% or so of what MJ did in the draft? Do we have to spend a 1st or 2nd to get that caliber player in this years draft? I think we do with the weakness of the prospects at WR this year. If you think we can get one later then fine, but remember Jones and sanu produced very little their first seasons.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: WR's in Rd's 3 and 5...again? - J24 - 04-26-2016, 08:48 PM
RE: WR's in Rd's 3 and 5...again? - pulses - 04-26-2016, 08:58 PM
RE: WR's in Rd's 3 and 5...again? - J24 - 04-26-2016, 09:07 PM
RE: WR's in Rd's 3 and 5...again? - leonardfan40 - 04-26-2016, 09:08 PM
RE: WR's in Rd's 3 and 5...again? - J24 - 04-26-2016, 09:10 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)