Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
WR's in Rd's 3 and 5...again?
#18
(04-26-2016, 09:45 PM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Agree with you about Doctson but your wrong about Lafell. Look at his numbers from the previous year when he was healthy. He was never healthy last season.

I loved the LaFell signing, don't get me wrong, but he is no MJ. I certainly think he'll be better than he was last year, but we also need to consider the fact that he was playing for the Pats and catching passes from a future HOF. Also he is a couple years older and coming off an injury plagued season. I think he is past his prime, but still a very good fit for this team. I think we need another WR to be around as productive as LaFell will be this season in order to be in good shape. Plus if LaFell goes down we'd have nothing, its not like when we had Sanu when MJ went down.

The wild card in all of this is Tyler Kroft. If the team uses the two tight end sets more and more efficiently (and he takes the next step which he showed he might be able to do) we might be able to get by with a 3-4th rounder that only gets 300-400 yards.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: WR's in Rd's 3 and 5...again? - J24 - 04-26-2016, 08:48 PM
RE: WR's in Rd's 3 and 5...again? - pulses - 04-26-2016, 08:58 PM
RE: WR's in Rd's 3 and 5...again? - J24 - 04-26-2016, 09:07 PM
RE: WR's in Rd's 3 and 5...again? - J24 - 04-26-2016, 09:10 PM
RE: WR's in Rd's 3 and 5...again? - leonardfan40 - 04-26-2016, 09:52 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)