Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
What should the Bengals change scheme wise?
#25
A few times try Hill and Gio in the backfield together.....Gio as the quick and fast.....Hill as the power runner Paul Brown always had in Motley, Jim Brown, Phillips, Clark, Pete Johnson, Kinnebrew, Ickey.....

Not all the time.......but now and then to throw something different at defenses. .....just a basic 2 back and 2 WR and 1 TE formation of days of old as was James Brooks and Ickey Woods.....but also use 3 WR....4 WR....2 TE.....1 RB....no RB.....use it all....do it all.....keep the D guessing.

and mix it up on our defense also....keep the other team guessing.

Now some will say 2 RBs on plays is a waste because only one can carry the ball. The defense doesn't know which one though, and that is the problem for defenses. Plus, both these guys can catch, so it can always be one or both going out for passes and then 5 possible receivers if the defense see's 2 backs and goes into a run defense. Paul Brown won with it. ....Not all the time, no, but now and then, use a 2 back formation.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: What should the Bengals change scheme wise? - kevin - 06-26-2015, 08:41 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)