Top 5 Bengals Of All Time

[Essex Johnson]

(05-21-2016, 11:44 AM)Shake n Blake Wrote: How so? If you compare Curtis to his peers, he never led his conference in receiving like Chad did (four times) and he was hardly ever in the top 10 in the NFL in receiving. 

Honestly, I think some just hate Chad and don't want to acknowledge his greatness. Also, older doesn't always = better, especially when Chad dominated his era and Curtis did not.

I just pointed out why I would take Curtis.. he had a higher YPC and much higher TD ratio... you seem confused, im not comparing them to their peers, im comparing them with the Bengals and their impact at the time.  It is difficult to compare different eras... Is there something wrong with putting Chad 6th, I don;t think that is hating on him, I am just giving you why I believe Curtis should be in top 5.  if you look back at his stats with the league,, he was in top of the league in his core years in YPC, TDs, Receiving Yards so he was one of the top WRs and  he was 1/2 team ALL NFL 3 years not the bum you seem to make him out to be.