Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Clinton's took 100M from Saudis
#28
(05-25-2016, 12:09 PM)fredtoast Wrote: There is no way we get a third party in the white House any time soon, and it would take massive election reform just to get some other parties in congress.


But we would only need other "third parties" to control 10 to 15 percent of the votes to start getting some compromise deals done.

What if one of the choices on the ballot was something like "Neither" or something to suggest that you did not want to elect either guy? Might be interesting if Trump gets elected as President but had only 30% of the vote while over 50% voted for "neither". I think it would stop all this "madate" talk the president-elect always spews after winning.
[Image: giphy.gif]





Messages In This Thread
RE: Clinton's took 100M from Saudis - PhilHos - 05-25-2016, 01:13 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 9 Guest(s)