Eifert Example Pro Bowl Needs Eliminated

[Daddy-O]

(05-26-2016, 01:14 AM)kevin Wrote: But you have to factor in the injury factor in this stupid exhibition game.  Eifert is only an example.  Owners should be very ticked off when their best players get injured not playing for their teams who pay their salaries, but injured in this pointless Pro Bowl.   It IS football, and in football, injuries happen.  That in itself right there is reason for all the owners to stop the Pro Bowl.  Every single owner should want this stopped, because every single owners has much to lose by having a top player injured in this game. .....Add to it that you can not bring these players together, have a week of sloppy practice, and expect these players to perform as a team in one weeks time.  That increases the chances of injuries. ........The Injury Factor should eliminate the Pro Bowl forever. ...Owners should insist on it's elimination.  I guarantee you if alive, Paul Brown would be leading the owners to it's elimination after losing this top tight end to injury in this pointless exhibition game. .......Paul Brown got other owners to understand the injury factor in stopping the College All-Star Game, and the injury factor should stop the also pointless Pro Bowl Game. ........Consider if a team lost a franchise quarterback in this Pro Bowl to injury. That should scare every single owner. 

Mike Brown should be more pissed off that Eifert has essentially sat around for 4 months before surgery obviously became a last option. The Bengal medical staff seems to have these types of brainfarts all the time.  Likely a fairly minor surgery due to the recuperation time.  Why not just do the dang minor procedure in March?