2016 options?

[t3r3e3]

(06-27-2015, 05:59 PM)t3r3e3 Wrote: Me and many others.  Your assertions obviously don't take 2014 into consideration.  It's hard to overhype a QB who produces when it matters, doesn't turn the ball over much, is a consummate leader, and has shown that he can carry his team.  Wilson isn't in the same class as Rodgers/Brady/Manning, but he's solidly in the next tier.  I posted the career stats for Wilson and Dalton.  Obviously you didn't look at Wilson's because it shoots holes through your opinions like 00 buckshot.

Here they are again:  

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/W/WilsRu00.htm

http://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/D/DaltAn00.htm

In the three years both have been in the league Wilson has 72 passing TD's (Dalton has 79), and 26 INT's.  Dalton has 53, or more than double what Wilson has thrown.  Dalton has 11360 passing yards, and Wilson has 9950.  So, to compile 1410 more passing yards over 3 seasons, Dalton has thrown twice the picks that Wilson has.  That's a pick for every 52 yards.  Wilson also has 1250 more rushing yards than Andy in that time period.

Wilson destroys Dalton in pretty much all meaningful categories.  Better TD:TO percentage, better passer rating, higher completion percentage, higher yards/attempt, better advanced passing stats, better postseason passing stats, etc.....   The only reason Andy has more raw passing yards is a function of the Gruden pass-centric offense.  Last year Wilson threw for more yards than Dalton, with more TD's, far less turnovers, a passer rating 20+ points higher, higher YPA, and far better advanced stats.  All throwing to Jermaine Kearse, Paul Richardson, Doug Baldwin, and Luke Wilson.  Don't try to use the Andy's receivers were subpar argument.  Even with injuries the Bengals had a better group of receivers than Seattle.
One final nugget:

Remember that list awhile back that showed Dalton was at the bottom all time for postseason passers?  Wilson was in the 85th percentile or better.