Let them fight! Round 2

[Johnny Cupcakes]

(06-27-2015, 08:35 PM)Penn Wrote: I'll say easily* King Kong because the OP didn't specify which version of Kong.

Tyrannosaurus - Largest complete skeleton was 12.3 meters (40 ft) in length and 4 meters (13ft) at the hips (remember, they were usually leaning forward with the tail as counterweight but could stand up which we'll get to with Godzilla). 5.4 - 6.8 metric tons (6 - 7.2 short tons).  Many scientists actually believe he wasn't a predator, but a scavenger.  This makes a difference in fighting ability.

Godzilla in King Kong Vs. Godzilla - 100 meters (328 ft) long and stood 50 meters (164 ft).  20,000 tons (I'm assuming metric since the site I got this info from is in metric so 22 of our tons).  This dude was an obvious predator.  If the mechanics are right from the fictional Godzilla to a T-Res then T-Rex only stands at a bit over 6 meters or about 20 ft.

To complete the scale so you know KK's size compared to an actual T-Rex - In King Kong Vs. Godzilla Kong stood at 45 meters (147.6 ft) and weighed in at 25,000 tons.  This is the largest version of King Kong.  This version of Kong tosses T-Rex around a like a little rag-doll and force feeds his bloodied corpse to a plant eating brontosaurus for fun.

Other Kong sizes depending on version are a puny 7.62 meters the 2005, 15.24 meters and 20 meters.  The closest we have here to the King Kong Vs Godzilla scale to a King Kong Vs T-Rex scale would be the smallest (2005) and the only real fight.  

The 2005 version a Kong was scarred up indicating he was battle hardened and tough but I'm not as confident in his win here.  If tyrannosaurus was a scavenger Kong wins because Ole Rex will run away faster than a message board bully back in his school days.  If he was a true predator maybe he could take Kong but I still say Kong shoud win.

With analyses like these, Penn should be the final go-to opinion on these vs. threads.