Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Boyd's Not Expected To Start
#52
(06-02-2016, 06:28 PM)BoomerFan Wrote: Gotta admit I don't love how LaFell is just given the #2 spot. Makes me miss the days of Jay Gruden (never met a WR he didn't like...).

He was the most-proven guy when he signed and he has shown to be a reliable receiver in the NFL, which none of the rookies have.

Plus, being named the #2 right now doesn't really mean shit because it's so early.  

At first, I did want him to be the #2, but, now, as I said in the OP, I'm ok with Lafell being listed ahead of him on a meaningless depth chart, especially since I think that our offense will be so high-powered and score so much that Boyd will have plenty of opportunities, as will Core.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Boyd's Not Expected To Start - BFritz21 - 06-01-2016, 07:53 PM
RE: Boyd's Not Expected To Start - bfine32 - 06-01-2016, 10:43 PM
RE: Boyd's Not Expected To Start - Au165 - 06-02-2016, 04:23 PM
RE: Boyd's Not Expected To Start - Au165 - 06-02-2016, 11:25 AM
RE: Boyd's Not Expected To Start - Au165 - 06-02-2016, 12:57 PM
RE: Boyd's Not Expected To Start - Au165 - 06-02-2016, 05:11 PM
RE: Boyd's Not Expected To Start - Au165 - 06-02-2016, 05:33 PM
RE: Boyd's Not Expected To Start - BFritz21 - 06-02-2016, 07:02 PM
RE: Boyd's Not Expected To Start - J24 - 06-02-2016, 07:21 PM
RE: Boyd's Not Expected To Start - Derrick - 06-02-2016, 09:03 PM
RE: Boyd's Not Expected To Start - jason - 06-05-2016, 11:49 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)