07-06-2016, 02:13 PM
(07-06-2016, 01:26 PM)Nebuchadnezzar Wrote: 18 United States code section 793 (f)
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793
Gross Negligence
An indifference to, and a blatant violation of, a legal duty with respect to the rights of others.
Gross negligence is a conscious and voluntary disregard of the need to use reasonable care, which is likely to cause foreseeable grave injury or harm to persons, property, or both. It is conduct that is extreme when compared with ordinary Negligence, which is a mere failure to exercise reasonable care. Ordinary negligence and gross negligence differ in degree of inattention, while both differ from willful and wanton conduct, which is conduct that is reasonably considered to cause injury. This distinction is important, since contributory negligence—a lack of care by the plaintiff that combines with the defendant's conduct to cause the plaintiff's injury and completely bar his or her action—is not a defense to willful and wanton conduct but is a defense to gross negligence. In addition, a finding of willful and wanton misconduct usually supports a recovery of Punitive Damages, whereas gross negligence does not.
http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/gross+negligence
According to the law and the definition, Hillary Clinton broke the law and should be prosecuted. You can't spin this any other way, it's right there in black and white, Hillary Clinton broke the law.
Then anybody using email for any secret info should be found guilty of negligence. I could see if the governemnt never gets hacked and they had a 100% security record. But they just dont. When was the use of a .gov email fully implemented? And was hillary the only politician that sent stuff with an account other than the .gov one? If not let step back and comb through all the emails sent by every politician who had secret info in the last 10 years. Once we get done with that we can get back to Hillary using a server that was for a former president that was guarded by secret service.
Trump accidentally tweets racist shit to the world while campaigning to be president. At least Hillary was only sending private emails.
