Poll: Where we got the LBs
This poll is closed.
1-5 (Elite)
17.39%
4 17.39%
6-10 (Top 10)
30.43%
7 30.43%
11-16 (Average to slightly above)
52.17%
12 52.17%
17-25 (Below average)
0%
0 0%
26-32 (Among the worst in the NFL)
0%
0 0%
Total 23 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rank the LBs
#13
This one is hard for me and became increasingly so as I composed the list. There are a lot of big names without a lot of stats and a lot of no names with big numbers. For instance if a member of another board's forum were doing this and came to the Bengals he might list Vincent Rey as the starter over Rey Maualuga and then the Bengals top three would have a combination of 280 tackles, 2 sacks, 5 INTs, and 4 FFs.

I would ask we don't knock the collective because of VB's suspension; as I doubt anyone downgraded Brady because of his. So we have the best WILL in the game, a veteran SAM that can get after the QB and cover the TE, and a MIKE that is a force in the run game. Giving all other teams the benefit of the doubt. I will put them top 10
[Image: bfine-guns2.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Rank the LBs - bfine32 - 07-07-2016, 04:56 PM
RE: Rank the LBs - 3wt - 07-07-2016, 07:13 PM
RE: Rank the LBs - SunsetBengal - 07-07-2016, 07:30 PM
RE: Rank the LBs - jason - 07-07-2016, 07:37 PM
RE: Rank the LBs - Mike M (the other one) - 07-07-2016, 08:36 PM
RE: Rank the LBs - jeremydc - 07-08-2016, 01:01 AM
RE: Rank the LBs - jason - 07-08-2016, 01:18 AM
RE: Rank the LBs - jeremydc - 07-08-2016, 01:46 AM
RE: Rank the LBs - Thundercloud - 07-08-2016, 04:05 AM
RE: Rank the LBs - Jpoore - 07-08-2016, 07:50 AM
RE: Rank the LBs - jeremydc - 07-08-2016, 08:29 AM
RE: Rank the LBs - Jpoore - 07-08-2016, 08:41 AM
RE: Rank the LBs - bfine32 - 07-08-2016, 10:24 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)