Rudy G. Says ‘BLM’ Is ‘Inherently Racist’

[BmorePat87]

(07-14-2016, 06:54 AM)Sovereign Nation Wrote: More projection.  You are the only one that has called me a White Supremacist, I have never claimed superiority over any race. 

In order to expedite things I have tried to go with the approach, sure I am a White Supremacist, now counter the argument, however true to form, you just keep going back to your ONLY argument which is only ad hominem, and not even remotely logical or reasoned.

Sad really, you teaching kids.

Now, you stated in your comment, that skin color is biological (which biology is scientific study of life) and then in the EXACT same sentence claim that race is not scientific. 

There is plenty of proof that show differences in the races.  Why can't Native Americans grow facial hair?  Why do Asians understand math at a higher level?  Why do Blacks have denser bones and better stamina with regards to athletics?  Why do whites have a bigger desire to explore?  Why do Jews do so well with money?  Even looking at the sexual (insert whatever joke you want Roto) organs, you can see differences in the biology of the different races.  Sure you can find exceptions to all of these, but don't all rules have exceptions?  The term is "The exception that proves the rule."

Anthropologist can look at the bones of someone and tell if they are white, black, Asian and so on.

Only bleeding hearts like yourself that thinks any of these types of inquiries are racist and designed to show "White superiority", cry about these differences and then try to shut them down.  

1. You are. Let's not bullshit, I know your views and you know I know your views. Man up and take ownership.

2. Don't feel sad for me. I know I could be doing better things with this wealth of knowledge, but I love my job. 

3. Race =/= skin color. The concept of race suggests that we are divided into three "races" that share certain features (bone structure, facial structure, skin color, etc). It takes real biological features, yes, but society lumped them together and suggested they constitute a race. Look at the hair color example I gave you. The issue with this is that these "races" do not actually show a commonality in gene clusters. There are no groups of genes that are only present in black people or that all black people share. As I pointed out, I'm likely to have more in common genetically with a black man my height than with a white man who is a foot shorter than me. 

4. You're just pointing out stereotypes, many of which are cultural and others based on ethnicity. There is incredible genetic variety within these so called "races" and you will find traits shared between them too. Scientists will argue that your genetic region of origin is far more important. The difference between being Irish or Russian will tell us more than the difference between being White or Black. 

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/race-is-a-social-construct-scientists-argue/

4. Scientists can look at femurs and skulls and make guesses based on some physical characteristics that are more common in regions of Europe, Africa, or Asia, but it is not an exact science because there are no shared racial traits. The features we as a society have attributed to "race" comprise about 15% of physical features. As a society, however, we have put an emphasis on things like skin color, even though it produces less variability in our genes.

5. After I stated a fact, you said my only argument was ad hominem, so it is only fitting that you end with one.