07-14-2016, 11:05 AM
Justices are suppose to make interpretations based on what they believe the Constitution says. That's 100% fueled by their ideology, and they are selected for that ideology.
This is a very different concept from suggesting that justice should be blind as we are not referring to due process in a criminal trial where all defendants should have an equal application of the law.
She can speak her mind on this. It's not directly related to the Constitution, and, even if it were, she's free to discuss her views on that too. Is anyone surprised that one of the most liberal justices who is a woman doesn't like Trump?
This is a very different concept from suggesting that justice should be blind as we are not referring to due process in a criminal trial where all defendants should have an equal application of the law.
She can speak her mind on this. It's not directly related to the Constitution, and, even if it were, she's free to discuss her views on that too. Is anyone surprised that one of the most liberal justices who is a woman doesn't like Trump?
![[Image: ulVdgX6.jpg]](http://i.imgur.com/ulVdgX6.jpg)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
