Another terrorist attack in France

[*bfine32*]

(07-15-2016, 05:46 PM)Benton Wrote: Well, if you're talking definitions...

prac·ti·cal·ly/ˈpraktək(ə)lē/

adverb

1. virtually; almost.
2. in a practical manner.
   

And then "As a result, Japan is “a country without Muslims”."

Then, yeah, I'm seeing some similarities there between the author calling it 'practically (virtually, almost) a country without Muslims,' "a country without Muslims" and "excluding Muslims." I honestly don't understand your point unless you're just being obtuse for the hell of it or you don't understand that using 3,000 words to say they're 'almost without Muslims by choice' is summed up by three words: they exclude Muslims.

Which is misleading.

mis·lead/misˈlēd/

verb

1. cause (someone) to have a wrong idea or impression about someone or something.
   

Your question — and the article cited to support it — are misleading.

All immigration is limited. It's not secular.



in·fer/inˈfər/

verb

1. deduce or conclude (information) from evidence and reasoning rather than from explicit statements.
   

No.

See, I can say that easily.



I answered your question. You disagree with the answer.



Different question. The answer to that one is yes.



That's not question that lends itself to a clear answer. I would say they don't accommodate non-Japanese. If you can navigate the country on your own, you'll do ok. If you depend on the society for employment, communication, resources... then you probably won't.

Never mind.