07-18-2016, 02:31 PM
(07-18-2016, 02:23 PM)Au165 Wrote: They are farfetched, but my point has been the same throughout. Allowing the temporary suspension of rights without a real credible reason is a bad idea in the long run.
I can't really tell what your point is anymore.
First you agree that there need to be exceptions. Then you say we can't have exceptions.
You list examples that you admit are "farfetched" thinking that it somehow proves we should not make exceptions when the example is NOT "farfetched".
My answer is simple. I believe in exceptions when the grounds are reasonable. The fact that you can come up with fact patterens that are not reasonable does not change anything. But when someone asks for an exception on grounds that are "farfetched" or "unreasonable" then I will oppose them just like you.
