07-18-2016, 02:32 PM
(07-18-2016, 09:04 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: No, you're the one ignoring my point.
No one wants Muslims to be able to legally kill people for blasphemy or stone women. The problem is that Newt, and apparently you, have decided to take "Sharia Law" and associate it with only the practices we find backwards or a violation of others' rights. The point is that it means much more, so saying no Sharia means no religious freedom. Instead of just saying "no Sharia Law", be more accurate. Especially if you're the former Speaker of the House.
Not to mention, merely believing in these things but not practicing them is still covered under the 1st Amendment.
Yuuuup....
Very similar to Christians, who pick and choose what parts of The Bible to follow.
Just like those with Sharia, it can keep them from ending up in prison.
I'm sure anyone strictly following the examples of The Old Testament would be detested equally as a person following strict Sharia Law.
Well.... unless discrimination is factored in.
