The Justices spar over the constitutionality of the death penalty

[*bfine32*]

(07-01-2015, 01:50 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: You know damn well we followed the ******' ROE!  You know better so don't act like an idiot or I will treat you like one.  You don't have to feel threatened in order to fire, otherwise we could never initiate contact, only react to contact.  You seem like an misinformed PV2 with that BS.

We took every measure to reduce collateral damage and yet collateral damage still happened because it is a reality of combat.

What soldier doesn't pull a trigger without the intent to kill?  I would call the intent to kill malice. Did you squeeze the trigger hoping you two could be friends? GTFOWTBS.

I'm asking you to explain your beliefs as you understand them and you're avoiding answering the question. Why was it morally acceptable for us to kill Iraqis IAW the ROE over bullshit WMDs?

And save the bullshit this time.

My apologies. I struggled with how to answer this and decided it was best that I did not do so in a public forum. Hopefully you have a strong support system and if you need anything feel free to PM me "Brother".