05-15-2015, 12:07 PM
Omg guys it's simple. La'Veon Bell's a pretty strong runner and he's also a very good pass catcher. He's also been successful for longer than Jeremy Hill has, that's why he's the #1 back.
Hill had a great rookie year. Better than any other back in this division (with the exception of Bell) has ever had so he's easily number two.
Bernard had a very nice rookie year and an okay sophomore campaign dealing with a few injuries.
Forsett had an extremely good year late in his career so that's why they are so close not that anyone is really arguing them two it's mostly just some BS between bfine and whoever else arguing Hill being a better runner. Who cares guys? Either way taking out pass catching abilities they're still two very good backs running the ball.
Gah trying to read what people are thinking as far as rankings go and I have to sift through 20 messages of arguing that I do not care about.
Hill had a great rookie year. Better than any other back in this division (with the exception of Bell) has ever had so he's easily number two.
Bernard had a very nice rookie year and an okay sophomore campaign dealing with a few injuries.
Forsett had an extremely good year late in his career so that's why they are so close not that anyone is really arguing them two it's mostly just some BS between bfine and whoever else arguing Hill being a better runner. Who cares guys? Either way taking out pass catching abilities they're still two very good backs running the ball.
Gah trying to read what people are thinking as far as rankings go and I have to sift through 20 messages of arguing that I do not care about.
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
