08-03-2016, 03:01 AM
(07-31-2016, 03:36 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: I'm still kind of floored no guy has challenged the fact that he has no real say....financially responsible if she keeps the baby, but no legal standing to object to an abortion.
And when you consider feticide laws....there's a real case to be made.
Someone did a few decades ago, but it got shut down pretty quick.
The problem with financial abortion is that taxpayers don't want to pick up the slack for absent farthers. But there's a hypocritical spin on people who use the "cost argument", considering single mother homes are pretty common despite not allowing men the right to financially abort. We're already paying out the arse for them through taxes and societal costs. Stastically speaking, single mothers are raising tomorrow's carjackers, drug addicts, gangmembers, you name it. It's kind of ****** that we subsidize the hell out of these criminal factories.
