On the issues

[GMDino]

GMDino

Political Party: Registered Democrat

Education:  BA, Communication St. Vincent College, 1991

Professional Background: Radio DJ 1991-1995, Furniture mover and manager of furniture store, 1995-1998, Sales in Industrial Tire Industry / General Manager 1998 - Present

Who I tend to agree with most based on the information presented in posts #1 and #2:
(With the caveat that there may be a lot of gray area where I could expand if given the opportunity)

A
1) Stein - I am personally against the procedure.
2) Johnson
3) All four
4) Everyone but Trump
5) Everyone but Trump
6) Everyone but Trump
7) Johnson/Stein - Although in very specific cases I can see the use of it.
8) Johnson/Stein
9) Johnson
10) Johnson
11) Johnson - However appointments should take into consideration that moving women up increases the pool of possible members.
12) Everyone but Johnson


B
1) Everyone but Trump
2) Trump
3) Clinton / Stein - Given that they or their family is working and paying into the tax system.
4) Clinton / Johnson
5) Trump
6) Clinton / Johnson
7) Everyone but Trump
8) Clinton / Johnson
9) Everyone but Trump

C
1) Clinton / Johnson
2) Johnson
3) Johnson / Stein - Although I would add it could be better utilized as is also.
4) Everyone but Trump
5) Johnson
6) Everyone but Trump
7) Johnson - Although without being the bog brother stepping in if the little brother started the fight.
8) Everyone
9) Johnson
10) Johnson - But intelligence gathering is OK 
11) Everyone but Trump
12) Johnson
13) Everyone
14) Everyone
15) Everyone but Clinton
16) Trump
17) Johnson - probably
18) Disagree with everyone

D
1) Trump / Clinton
2) Everyone but Trump
3) Trump / Clinton
4) Everyone but Stein
5) Clinton - With parts of Johnson allowing for each business to decide how to handle it.
6) Clinton
7) Trump - With the elimination of off shore / foreign hiding spots for profits.
8) Clinton / Stein
9) Trump / Clinton
10) Trump / Clinton
11) Trump / Stein
12) Everyone
13) Clinton / Stein
14) Stein
15) Trump
16) Everyone but Johnson
17) Clinton / Stein - But I would need to know what we get back for it.
18) Clinton / Stein
19) Clinton / Stein

F
1) Clinton / Stein
2) Johnson / Stein
3) Everyone but Johnson

G
1) Johnson - But I do think better background checks (if possible) would be good also.
2) Trump / Johnson
3) Everyone but Trump
4) Clinton / Stein
5) Everyone but Johnson
6) Everyone but Trump
7) Everyone but Trump
8) Trump / Johnson
9) Everyone but Trump
10) Trump / Clinton
11) Everyone but Trump
12) Johnson / Stein
13) Everyone but Trump
14) Everyone but Johnson
15) Johnson - Although the word "seize" leads me there.  If compensation for public projects is included I could go that way too.
16) Johnson / Stein
17) Clinton

H
1) Clinton / Stein - Although I had to "force" parents to do things, I can see from the aspect of protecting other children.
2) Disagree with all - the answer is no.
3) Everyone but Trump

I
1) Stein


J
1) Clinton / Stein
2) Johnson
3) Clinton
4) Clinton / Stein

K
1) Clinton / Stein
2) Everyone but Trump
3) Johnson - But I believe in more of a rehabilitation effort too.

.........



So that's clear as mud now!