Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights
(08-05-2016, 03:59 PM)bfine32 Wrote: 1. Not according to Fred and he's a lawyer. I think everyone is aware of what SCOTUS rule is; doesn't mean we have to agree with it; only adhere to it

2. The why must the man be forced to support a child he did not agree to?

3. She has control of his finances which directly reflects his quality of life.

1) If you are aware of the decision, why are you asking questions that the U.S. Supreme Court has already answered?

2) Would you believe it is because of state law?

3) You don't actually believe paying child support is the same as controlling someone's finances, do you?  Is that the same as forcing another to do something with their body against their wishes?





Messages In This Thread
RE: Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights - oncemoreuntothejimbreech - 08-05-2016, 04:44 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)