Hillary: An Unborn Child Hours Before Delivery Has No Constitutional Rights

[*bfine32*]

(08-07-2016, 07:46 PM)fredtoast Wrote: No because she is not forcing him to do something that he has not already consented to,

If the man consents that a child can be the result of the sex then he can not claim he is being forced to do something he does not want to if a child is born.

So why isn't she required to carry his baby to term if the father wants it? She has already consented to being pregnant. 

Does only she get "take backs"? Seems sexist.