08-11-2016, 04:31 PM
(08-11-2016, 04:17 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Again, they didn't rule on the constitutionality of anything nor did they declare the court order "wrong". They temporarily blocked a specific court order that allowed a specific boy to use the boys bathroom, not locker rooms, at his specific school. Since they haven't made a decision on how Title IX is interpreted, the DOJ and DOE's current interpretation of it can still stand.
Why didn't the lower court's interpretation stand? Are you suggesting that the DOJ can interpret the law?
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)
