08-25-2016, 10:13 PM
(08-25-2016, 05:57 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Was this when folks were taking the word of that female blogger over McHugh's because they are open-minded?
(08-25-2016, 06:00 PM)bfine32 Wrote: But no thoughts on an opinion piece written by a blogger on Transadvocate? Surely no bias there.
(08-25-2016, 07:40 PM)bfine32 Wrote: No Fred, your link calls it an opinion piece. Keep that "open" mind.
(08-25-2016, 07:44 PM)bfine32 Wrote: It was just interesting that one source gave you pause because it was partisan (biased); yet another did not. But at least you didn't want to pile on.
(08-25-2016, 07:49 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Nope, I'm just going to take it for what it is. An opinion piece written by an obviously biased author posted on an obviously biased website.
Keep digging and keep that mind "open" fred. I remember how funny it was last time.
(08-25-2016, 08:40 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Guess we just disagree on something giving one pause.
(08-25-2016, 09:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: No doubt I am the one who has failed in this thread. You came in hard with your biased opinion piece that you spent "a lot of time" researching, call McHugh a schill, and suggest you produce facts.
You dismiss McHugh's findings and call him a schill and then in Fred logic call someone else childish for attacking a source.
Between the 2 of us 1 has failed.
(08-25-2016, 06:00 PM)bfine32 Wrote: But no thoughts on an opinion piece written by a blogger on Transadvocate? Surely no bias there.
(08-25-2016, 07:40 PM)bfine32 Wrote: No Fred, your link calls it an opinion piece. Keep that "open" mind.
(08-25-2016, 07:44 PM)bfine32 Wrote: It was just interesting that one source gave you pause because it was partisan (biased); yet another did not. But at least you didn't want to pile on.
(08-25-2016, 07:49 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Nope, I'm just going to take it for what it is. An opinion piece written by an obviously biased author posted on an obviously biased website.
Keep digging and keep that mind "open" fred. I remember how funny it was last time.
(08-25-2016, 08:40 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Guess we just disagree on something giving one pause.
(08-25-2016, 09:32 PM)bfine32 Wrote: No doubt I am the one who has failed in this thread. You came in hard with your biased opinion piece that you spent "a lot of time" researching, call McHugh a schill, and suggest you produce facts.
You dismiss McHugh's findings and call him a schill and then in Fred logic call someone else childish for attacking a source.
Between the 2 of us 1 has failed.
So far you haven't had a damn thing to say about the actual topic. Thank Zues you are here to tell everyone to attack the message and not the messenger while you ignore your own "t shirt" slogans.
