09-06-2016, 01:15 PM
(09-06-2016, 12:56 AM)wildcats forever Wrote: Well, if Gould has to be replaced, Barth looks like a good choice. Who Knows? Maybe he's the Bears next Robbie Gould.
Gotta say this: Gould's career stats are not to be denied. I'd sign him but you'd be able to knock me over with a feather if the Bengals do. Cutting Nugent now just isn't Bengals-like.
Cutting him at all isn't very Bengals-like, especially right now.
(09-06-2016, 10:22 AM)XenoMorph Wrote: nugents salary has already been fully garenteed for the year.... so probly not.
Well now we can definitely forget it. Sad that this franchise would put loyalty or money ahead of having the best possible player on the field.
Heck, I almost feel like they replaced Tate by accident. It's not like they made a conscious effort to find players to replace him. Erickson was supposed to be a typical camp body. They just stumbled on a diamond in the rough there. He forced their hand.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
