09-12-2016, 02:14 PM
(09-12-2016, 01:52 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: and Webster, Oxford, and every sociology text I've taught with.
(09-12-2016, 01:52 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: lol, a semantics argument. At least you're consistent.
What he said...
But as I asked: What other type of arguement can you have over the definition of a word. I see you have breech thinging there is another, lol.
But here's what that Webster dude said:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/homophobe
webster Wrote:a person who hates or is afraid of homosexuals or treats them badly
So by pat and Hills logic if someone chooses not to vote for someone because they are homosexual they hate, are afraid, and/or treat them badly.
I do hope the scope of your teachings is quite narrow; we need more independent thinking people in the world.
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)