Hills slams over 11 million American Citizens

[BmorePat87]

(09-12-2016, 02:46 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Nope I provided you with a definition of the word in question

You actually provided me a definition of "homophobe" not "homohpobic". The reason why is because Webster's definition of "homophobic", the word you have said I am not defining properly, included "discrimination against" while the definition of "homophobe" only said "treat badly". 

This is called intellectual dishonesty. 

Quote:; you can interpret it (and teach it) as you wish. 

I will continue to interpret and teach "discrimination against" as meaning "discrimination against", but I appreciate your permission.

Quote:Are you suggesting someone is being discriminated against because someone didn't vote for them based on their beliefs?

No, beliefs is too broad of a categorization. If you think someone cannot be President because they are gay or Muslim, that certainly suggests you hold prejudicial views. However, trying to deny gay marriage is discrimination and I am suggesting that.