09-13-2016, 01:31 AM
(09-12-2016, 02:25 PM)bfine32 Wrote: If you re-read it; you will (should) see that is exactly what I did. You are welcome.
Okay, let's re-read it together.
(09-12-2016, 02:14 PM)bfine32 Wrote: What he said...
But as I asked: What other type of arguement can you have over the definition of a word. I see you have breech thinging there is another, lol.
But here's what that Webster dude said:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/homophobe
So by pat and Hills logic if someone chooses not to vote for someone because they are homosexual they hate, are afraid, and/or treat them badly.
I do hope the scope of your teachings is quite narrow; we need more independent thinking people in the world.
Whose "teachings" are you insulting? Pat's "teachings". That is a personal insult. You aren't attacking any message. You're attacking the messenger. Are you going to continue to insult your own intelligence by feigning otherwise?
