Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Justices spar over the constitutionality of the death penalty
(07-08-2015, 12:18 AM)Johnny Cupcakes Wrote: The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 is a United States law which recognizes a child in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species ***** sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb"

The United States government has passed laws that make it so that you can catch a double murder charge for killing a woman who is carrying a child.....of ANY developmental stage.  Termination of the fetus is considered murder under this law.  Murder, as in ending a life.  

Is anyone in disagreement with this law?  Should the murder of the woman carrying the child NOT be considered a double homicide?

I disagree with that law.

No one refers to a pregnant woman as "you two people".

When I file my taxes I never got to claim a fetus as a dependent.

When we do the national census we don't count unborn children as individuals.

I could on and on and on and on with examples of how no one considers an unborn child as a person.  It defies logic that killing a pregnant woman should be considered a double homicide.





Messages In This Thread
RE: The Justices spar over the constitutionality of the death penalty - fredtoast - 07-08-2015, 12:31 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 22 Guest(s)