09-16-2016, 12:37 PM
(09-16-2016, 12:01 PM)masterpanthera_t Wrote: Yup, makes sense. I really don't know how I missed this on the first read, it's clear as day. I think I agree on your points, but as a devil's advocate let me make Brad's argument for him: he can contend that he has reformed himself and therefore has the right to hold his stance (this is the only intellectually honest viewpoint I can think of that allows for the consistency in the statements).
I think one can object to something for moral reasons without believing the government needs to outlaw that something. However, many people don't seem to agree. Brad is one of those who doesn't agree.
