AFC North Defenses: 2015

[BFritz21]

(07-08-2015, 10:56 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I'm not an expert, though I am currently teaching Algebra for summer school, but I don't think 60=80

I hope you don't teach any word problems with statistics or distances because it was more like 65, but it was the same principle because big ol' #79 couldn't have caught him with 15 extra yards, and I'm sure someone will say "oh, so a 5 yard touchdown run is the same as an 80 yard run?"  But that's hilarious and not even anywhere near accurate because the defenses would have been different for a 5 yard run, whereas if everything played out the same on an 80 yard run, it would have looked the exact same with the same defense, whereas the entire defense and defenders would have been in a different position if it were from the 5.

(07-08-2015, 11:00 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: I also like the random 13 carry statistic. I'm sure his 40 yards on 13 carries is what beat the Bucs, lol.

You should have said 4-1 when he carries 20 or more times. It's a better statistic.

You still ignore the fact, and try and use humor to cover the fact that you're avoiding it, that you asked for one time, and did so in a manner that made it sound like I couldn't supply even one time.

(07-08-2015, 11:05 PM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Im also assuming you didn't just point out his many 20+ yard runs because Forsett had more than twice as many as he did despite only carrying 13 more times (there's that 13 carries again).

Forsett was a friggin beast last season. Most 20+ yard runs and best YPC of all RBs.

Once again, diverge the thread into something that's safer for you because I supplied what you asked for in a manner that acted as if I couldn't do it.