09-19-2016, 05:42 PM
(09-19-2016, 05:16 PM)SunsetBengal Wrote: I'm not here trying to bash you, or discredit either your opinion or eyesight, but the TV commentators had no problem seeing that it should have been a challenge, and I agree with them. The question is; Why do our coaches in the booth not have the same camera angles and technology that we all see on television? Or, is it more that they are just not paying close enough attention up there?
OR, do they see the same big picture we see where the game was ref-tilted to Shitsburgh again this year, like in years past, and figured on something borderline that there was no reason to waste the challenge in that situation and save it for a situation later on where there might be a call that is just 100% undeniably wrong and would HAVE to get changed...? Maybe the 1% doubt was enough to assume we'd get shafted like usual and just not to even bother with anything less than 100% clearcut (though that apparently doesn't exist anymore once the Boyd fumble call stood later in the game)
