AFC North Defenses: 2015

[BFritz21]

(07-09-2015, 06:36 AM)BmorePat87 Wrote: Then say what you mean. You can't get upset because I respond to exactly what you say. There's a big difference between 60 and 80. Either way, 3 times isn't a lot.

Also, trying to insult my profession when I respond to exactly what you say makes you look like a clown.




17 > 8. Forsett led the league in big runs. If you want to argue "big touchdown runs" then that's fine. If we're just discussing big runs, he was the best.




You were discussing how if he runs the ball 10 times, he will break off an 80 yard run. That happened once when he ran 20+ times. I guess it's your fault for expecting someone to read what you say.


You misspoke and that's fine. Next time say "Ok, I was exaggerating, but the point I was trying to make was that he had 3 really good 60+ yard runs last season, 2 of which were touchdowns. He has great speed and can't be caught once he breaks one off. If they're not careful, he's going to catch them off guard."

You're wondering why people take me more seriously than you and call you immature. This is a great example. Because instead of saying this your response was to act like I am dumb for not realizing that when you wrote "80" you really meant "60". Hopefully you understand this and can make a change. I'm really trying to be nice here but you're making it hard.

You wonder why people can't take you seriously when I pointed out in the previous post that it was 65, yet you once again post more than once that it was only 60.  

Why's it different and ok when you do it?  Why do people take you seriously and not me when you do the same thing?

And 20+ yard runs are good runs, but I wouldn't call them big runs.

Furthermore, like I said, which you once again ignored, is that 65 or 80 yards, the defense would have been playing it the same way and the run would have gone the same way, with him just running 15 extra yards to score.  The point wasn't about the statistics, it was about the abilities.