09-26-2016, 11:51 AM
(09-26-2016, 11:40 AM)GMDino Wrote: Oddly I just used the doctor example in the response above:
It's not "telling people what to do" as much as looking at what they did and seeing if they did something wrong or could have done it bor could do it better in the future.
It's called learning.
Another example would be my own posting. I've posted things that turned out to not be the way I took them in the first place. I try to check things before just randomly sharing them. Sometimes I am still wrong. Sometimes I am right and people don't want to believe it because I wrong before.
I attempt to learn from my mistakes because I know I am not perfect, nor am I always right. But I do believe that just not talking about things is wrong.
Right, and using the medical process they use peer review to determine when things are incorrect (journals, procedures, licensing). I simply contend it should be peers who review the policy (not the improper use of policy) and propose improvements. I think it's a fair debate, and as I have said in most cases I am okay with outside perspective as I think sometimes you can be too close, simply not in this case in my mind.
