09-28-2016, 10:16 AM
I said 7-8 weeks.
Then I said 6.
We're going to be, at-minimum, week 5, until we see him.
How long until he's not on limited snaps?
Like others said, saying week 6, 7, 8 weeks, that's all conjecture. And just because he's "on the field", does that mean he's fully healthy?
The whole point is that in MAY, when we discussed this, people actually didn't worry about it. Given that this is a fragile player who from all accounts completely mishandled this situation, it's crazy that people thought he would be good to go week 1.
Then I said 6.
We're going to be, at-minimum, week 5, until we see him.
How long until he's not on limited snaps?
Like others said, saying week 6, 7, 8 weeks, that's all conjecture. And just because he's "on the field", does that mean he's fully healthy?
The whole point is that in MAY, when we discussed this, people actually didn't worry about it. Given that this is a fragile player who from all accounts completely mishandled this situation, it's crazy that people thought he would be good to go week 1.
