Dalton or Luck?

[Shake n Blake]

(10-01-2016, 11:48 PM)jason Wrote: Shake... AJ Green alone makes Dalton's life easier. The Colts don't have a single player of that caliber on offense. Hilton's no slouch; but he ain't AJ Green.

Luck has never had that kind of talent to work with. He got an older Reggie Wayne, an older Frank Gore, old Andre Johnson.

In no way am I knocking Dalton. I just think Luck is the superior talent. Dalton has outplayed him for a season and some change, but they count on Luck to elevate that team. Dalton is more of a point guard ... He gets the ball to his playmakers. He couldn't do squat with that Indy team. Luck would look really good on the Bengals.

Andy definitely holds his own in comparison to Luck though.

Sorry man, I'm just not buying the tired old "AJ (or the weapons) makes Andy" argument that's been used to discredit Andy since day 1. Dalton has played well without AJ, and he's continued to play at a high level after losing MLJ, Sanu and Eifert when many thought he'd look rough without them. Maybe it's time people simply acknowledge that the dude can ball, and stop giving all the credit to someone else.

We have a damn good QB. Period.

(10-02-2016, 04:28 PM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: Luck is probably the most overrated QB in the NFL. Career 58.4% completion, 7.0 ypa, ~16 int per 16gms, 85.4 QB rating, ~10 fumbles per 16gms.

Combine that with the fact I believe he is career sub-.500 outside of the truly awful AFCS.

If they played in a more competitive division, they might make the Browns look decent. Luck is hella overrated.

Luck's numbers don't look so good when you include all of them.

(10-03-2016, 12:04 AM)34blast Wrote: True fans here who love their team.  Ask any GM and they will laugh at this question,  Luck is far superior.

Most arguments that Luck is far better than Andy are going to lack facts and feature speculation. Fact is, none of us know this. It's quite possible that the opinion of GMs would surprise you. None of us know.