07-11-2015, 11:28 AM
(07-11-2015, 12:29 AM)Stormborn Wrote:
That's some of the worst logic I think I've ever seen, because Robert played over 600 snaps and more than 50% of the team's total snaps, he was better than those who didn't play as many or barely played at all... even though his per snap production was literally bottom of the league.
I'm done, this can't continue. I can't believe I've wasted this much time trying to explain why Geathers sucks.
Yeah, you are probably right. How silly of me to think that the guys who play are better than the guys who don't play.
I mean all we have to do is look at the stats that don't include the guys who didn't play to prove that the guys who didn't play are better. How can I disagree with logic like that?
