07-12-2015, 03:07 PM
(07-12-2015, 01:51 PM)Luvnit2 Wrote: I factor in age because I took your post as an either AD or someone else. As I mentioned, if we keep AD on the team, then yes I am on board with the Peyton Manning, Romo's and others. But I would not bankrupt the future and put all of my eggs in one basket for aging QB's when the jury is still out on the one we have now.
If so, I look at 2015 and want instant success, but I also have an eye on the future and know QB's who help their team go to the playoffs as a rookie and then for 3 years are scarce unless you have the number one overall pick in a "Andrew Luck" type year. I don't see this team getting a number 1 pick and being the worst team in the NFL in the foreseeable future with AD or with one of the guys you listed.
Not sure I follow. In the post you referenced, I said this:
(07-11-2015, 11:31 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Seriously though, as of right now I'd take the following QB's over Andy this year:
...
So I'm not sure why you'd factor in age due to anything I said. When most people rank the best players, they don't factor in age, unless it's a list of best young players or something of that nature.
The training, nutrition, medicine, fitness, playbooks and rules evolve. The athlete does not.
