Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
FBI not happy Clinton wasn't charged
#5
(10-13-2016, 11:05 AM)TheLeonardLeap Wrote: I need to stay off P'n'R in the mornings. It's too early to start drinking and that OP is a depressing read. Lol

Even if she wasn't prosecuted, her security clearance should have most certainly been pulled. I know back when I had my clearance, if I had done even 1/3rd of what they found on Clinton, I would have almost certainly been in Leavenworth.

Apparently everyone should master the art of "I don't recall" and tarmac meetings to talk about grandkids and our prison overpopulation problems will be solved instantly.

I think one of the misunderstood things is that Elected Officials don't get security clearances like us lowly folk. They simply make a pledge, so there is nothing to revolk except say she lied about treating classified documents with the care they deserve. I could be wrong on this, as it has been a while since I researched.

It is extremely frustrating especially when you have over half of the voting population treating it as nothing.
[Image: bfine-guns2.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]





Messages In This Thread
RE: FBI not happy Clinton wasn't charged - bfine32 - 10-13-2016, 11:28 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)