NYT: Trump assaulted two women

[hollodero]

(10-15-2016, 01:26 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Well unfortunately for you, but fortunately for everybody else you do not get to decide who is guilty or not. If there were "proof" that he committed sexual assault he very well would be charged with a crime. 

I suppose the "why" is because I believe in due process and the presumption of innocence. I would most likely defend anyone against a lynch mob.

So as long as he is not actually charged with a crime, you keep backing him up no matter what.

As if it were about sentencing him to prison and you were a juror. When in fact it's about making him your next president and you are a voter. A situation where a different mindset is to be applied.

Regarding "lynch mob": All the "lynching" that's on the table right now is not voting for him and recognizing that he amongst other things is a sexist, amoral douchebag (but not convicted of a crime! Good luck explaining this logic to your kids one day). You chose a peculiar word here.
Now if people would shout "lock him up!", I would at least get your point.