NYT: Trump assaulted two women

[hollodero]

(10-15-2016, 10:12 AM)bfine32 Wrote: Nope, I just assume innocence and it is not hypocritical. The whole time folks were lynching Hills for Bengazi, I gave and still give her the benefit of the doubt.

I have no intention to vote for Donald Trump if Evan McMullin wasn't on the ballot in my state, I would stay at home. 

I guess it's just my sense of "fair play" when I see dude getting attacked from all sides based on nothing more than assumptions and allegations. And there is much more than not voting for him. 

Is sexual assault a crime and if so, why is he not charged?

OK - for me it's first and foremost about not voting for him at this point. Which you obviously are not planning to do.

So while until now I thought you just defend your guy no mattter what out of blind loyalty - I now believe you really take this stance you take out of principle. Which I respect of course, I still do not share your take (for I think formal innocence is not the most important criteria here), but well. As long as you don't vote for him...

As for your last question, I do not know about prescription, how fast your justice system works and if US laws would cover a charge at this point. But as I see it, there might be some evidence for a serious case now, given that there are now also victims/witnesses. But as I said, I don't know your system too good - for all I know, there might as well something be brewing already.